The (Lack of) Effectiveness of Weighted Pressure Vests for Children with Autism
Situation
1: You've heard that weighted pressure vests may help reduce challenging behavior in children with autism, but you're not sure you believe it.
The use of weighted vests on children with autism has been studied extensively by impartial researchers. It's been determined that this strategy does not result in significant positive effects on challenging behavior in children with autism.
When you are a
caregiver for children with autism, whether they are part of your family, your
classroom, or a therapy client, your goal is to use all the available resources
to support their needs. Choosing evidence-based
interventions is essential to ensure the most effective strategies are used and
that no valuable time is lost to ineffective, unproven interventions. In the
case of weighted pressure vests, there have been a substantial number of
studies that demonstrate and agree that there is no evidence of the vests effectively
reducing challenging behaviors in children with autism.
Refer to the matrix below for more details for each study.
Situation
2: You're convinced that weighted pressure vests help reduce challenging behavior such as anxiety and stereotypic behavior in children with autism.
There is a
widely spread false belief that weighted pressure vests reduce challenging behaviors in children with
autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This blog is one of many examples of how
misinformation continues to be shared, in spite of an abundance of research
that has disputed the belief and determined there is no evidence to prove any
positive outcome by implementing this intervention.
Neurodivergent
Insights
https://neurodivergentinsights.com/blog/weighted-vests-autism#:~:text=Weighted%20vests%20are%20especially%20beneficial,regulation%20by%20providing%20proprioception%20input.
The internet has simplified the spread of misinformation by well-meaning individuals and by individuals seeking monetary gain, alike. As provided in this blog, there is often very little free information but plenty of opportunities to purchase products that promise results. However, researchers publish peer-reviewed articles detailing scientific information in scholarly journals, following the rigorous methods required for evidentiary proof of effectiveness or as in the case of weighted vests… the lack of evidentiary proof of effectiveness.
Researchers who sought to determine if weighted pressure vests benefitted children with autism chose various behaviors as the target behavior. Challenging behaviors are often found to be comorbid with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), such as ADHD (Morrison, E. E., 2007), anxiety (Losinski, Mickey et al., 2017), self-injurious behavior (Doughty & Doughty, 2008), sensory processing problems (Morrison, E. E., 2007; Case-Smith, et al, 2015), and stereotypic behavior (also known as stimming or repetitive behavior) (Morrison, E. E.,2007; Watkins, et al, 2014)). Researchers targeting each of these behaviors have found that weighted pressure vests have not proven positive outcomes in children with ASD.Families
and caregivers of children with autism need effective, evidence-based
strategies to support children with autism at home. When social media, news
outlets, or bloggers promote products or equipment with the promise of making it
easier to support their children, parents optimistically and eagerly want to
believe the promises. Regardless of the numerous studies which have shown no
evidence of effectiveness, the desire and willingness to try the product in
hopes that there will be a positive outcome is powerful. When therapists tout
weighted-pressure vests as a way to calm children with ASD, caregivers expect to be able to trust
their professional advice. But is it scientifically-proven advice?
There have been studies that found one participant in
the group of participants benefitted in some way from wearing the vest, which
can give a caregiver hope. Rather than reading the headlines, caregivers must
read the entire article to uncover all the facts. For example, were all the
participants children with autism? Bodison,
et al (2018) found some limited evidence of effectiveness in increased participation
in the classroom, for children with attention deficit with hyperactivity disorder.
However, there was no significant reduction of challenging behavior found in
children with autism.
When choosing an intervention to benefit children with autism, it's imperative that evidence-based strategies are implemented, to ensure no valuable time is spent unwisely on debunked methods.
Refer to the matrix below for more details for each study. Please review the cited articles in the reference list to gain more understanding of the studies conducted. Each study determined there is a lack of evidence of effectiveness when using weighted pressure vests for positive outcomes in children with autism.
Synthesis Matrix- Weighted Pressure Vests
|
|
Losinski,
Mickey et al. (2017) |
Morrison,
E. E. (2007) |
Case-Smith,
et al (2015) |
Watkins,
et al (2014) |
Doughty
(2008) |
|
|
Intervention |
Weighted
pressure vest |
Weighted
pressure vest |
Weighted
pressure vest |
Weighted
pressure vest |
Weighted
pressure vest |
Weighted
pressure vest |
|
ASD and anxiety |
3 students were studied. Mixed
results. Lack of sufficient evidence of effectiveness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASD and stereotypic behaviors |
|
5 studies which met criteria
reviewed. No evidence of effectiveness to reduce stereotypic behavior |
|
|
3 children studied. Analysis of
the data found no reduction of stereotypic behaviors |
|
|
ASD and undesired behaviors |
Not effective in reducing
undesired behaviors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASD and Sensory processing
problems |
|
One study found a positive effect
for remaining seated and pressure seeking behaviors |
19 studies reviewed. No evidence
of positive benefit with sensory processing |
|
|
|
|
ASD and ADHD |
|
No increased focus |
One study showed positive results
improving attention and mixed results for distractibility |
8 studies reviewed. Limited
evidence of effectiveness for ADHD but not ASD behaviors |
|
|
|
ASD and Self-injurious behavior |
|
|
|
|
|
One 14yo participant. No difference in frequency with
or without vest. No evidence of effectiveness |
References
Bodison,
Stefanie C., and L. Diane Parham. “Specific Sensory Techniques and Sensory
Environmental Modifications for Children and Youth with Sensory Integration
Difficulties: A Systematic Review.” The American journal of occupational
therapy 72.1 (2018): 7201190040p1-7201190040p11. Web.
Case-Smith,
J., Weaver, L. L., & Fristad, M. A. (2015). A systematic review of sensory
processing interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Autism,
19(2), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361313517762
Doughty, Shannon S, and Adam H Doughty.
“Evaluation of Body-Pressure Intervention for Self-Injury in Autism.” Behavioral
development bulletin (Philadelphia, Pa.) 14.1 (2008): 23–29. Web.
Losinski, Mickey et al. “The Effects of Deep Pressure
Therapies and Antecedent Exercise on Stereotypical Behaviors of Students With
Autism Spectrum Disorders.” Behavioral disorders 42.4 (2017): 196–208.
Web.
Morrison,
E. E. (2007). A review of research on the use of weighted vests with children
on the autism spectrum. Education, 127(3), 323+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A205494745/AONE?u=tall85761&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=9d1d5f52
Watkins, N.,
& Sparling, E. (2014). The Effectiveness of the Snug Vest on Stereotypic
Behaviors in Children Diagnosed With an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Behavior
Modification, 38(3), 412-427.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514532128

